Exness vs Tickmill Trading Costs

Broker Cost Comparison

Exness vs Tickmill Trading Costs

Compare spread, commission and overnight-cost data using the same trading profile. This page focuses on cost structure and sends your selected scenario to the full True Trading Cost Calculator for the final calculation.

Exness logo
VS
Tickmill logo
SpreadAverage / typical pricing by instrument.
CommissionSeparate per-lot charges where applicable.
Overnight / SwapHolding-cost data when it can be normalized.
MethodologyAverage, minimum and pending data kept distinct.

Exness

The referenced Standard structure uses published average spread pricing with no separate trading commission in this comparison.

Standard accountCommission-free reference

Tickmill

The referenced Raw structure combines a lower typical spread with a separate commission charged per lot / side.

Raw accountSpread + commission

Compare Exness and Tickmill Cost Data

Set the same trading profile for both brokers. The button below opens the full calculator with your selections already applied.

Reset profile
Cost itemExness · StandardTickmill · RawDifference
Published spread basis 0.8 pip averageInstrument-specific reference 0.1 pip typicalRaw account reference 0.7 pip lower on TickmillSpread only — commission separate
Commission $0Referenced Standard account $6 / lot round turn$3 per lot / side $6 / lot more on TickmillMust be combined with spread cost
Overnight / swap Published reference availableMay vary by eligibility / entity Pending normalizationNo normalized value used here Not directly comparableUse the full calculator for current supported data
Scenario calculation Calculated in full toolSpread + commission + supported overnight data Calculated in full toolUses the exact same profile Open calculatorSee normalized monthly estimates side by side
EUR/USD · 0.50 lot · 40 trades/month · 0 nights · mostly long Open in True Trading Cost Calculator →

How to Read This Comparison

Spread and commission should be considered together. A lower raw spread can still include a separate commission, while a commission-free account may use a wider spread.

Trading costs explained →

Methodology & Data Basis

Average / typical pricing is kept separate from minimum “from” pricing. Incomplete or non-normalized values remain visible instead of being guessed.

Open calculator methodology →

Exness vs Tickmill FAQ

Why can a Raw account show a lower spread but still charge more commission?

Raw accounts usually separate the broker charge from the spread. The spread can therefore be tighter while a per-lot commission is charged separately. Total trading cost depends on both components.

Can I compare my own lot size and trading frequency?

Yes. Change the profile above and open the full calculator. Exness and Tickmill remain preselected while your instrument, lot size, trades, holding period and direction are passed through.

Why is overnight data sometimes marked pending?

Swap data can vary by account, entity, eligibility and day. ForexReview does not insert a normalized value when the public reference is not sufficiently comparable.

Does a lower estimated cost mean one broker is better overall?

No. This page compares trading-cost structure only. Regulation, execution, platforms, funding and country-specific availability are separate considerations.

Important: This page compares published pricing structures, not overall broker quality or suitability. Average / typical pricing is kept separate from minimum “from” pricing. Spreads, swaps, commissions and account terms can change and may differ by legal entity, platform and country.