FBS vs Exness Trading Costs
FBS vs Exness Trading Costs
Compare FBS’s public forex-wide spread floor and zero-commission structure with Exness Standard instrument-specific average spreads.
Verified cost dataset
Why a forex-wide floor and an instrument average should not be mixed
FBS publishes a clear high-level fee structure: floating forex spreads from 0.7 pip, no trading commission and swap-free availability. Its forex specification page also exposes minimal, typical and current-spread fields, but those values are dynamic and the public crawl does not provide a stable static instrument figure that ForexReview can safely freeze into this dataset.
Exness, by contrast, publishes a table of major pairs with previous-trading-day average spreads and swap fields. That lets the calculator model the Exness side more precisely while retaining FBS as a minimum-basis reference.
Cost comparison FAQ
Does FBS always charge 0.7 pip on EUR/USD?
No. FBS describes forex spreads as floating from 0.7 pip. The actual spread can change with instrument and market conditions.
Does FBS charge a trading commission?
The current public trading-conditions page states no trading commission for its trading ecosystem.
Why is Exness marked Comparable while FBS is Minimum Basis?
Exness supplies instrument-specific average values for the referenced Standard account. The stable FBS value available here is a forex-wide floor rather than a per-symbol average.