IC Markets vs XM Trading Costs
IC Markets vs XM Trading Costs
Compare IC Markets Raw Spread average pricing and commission with XM’s public spread floor while keeping the different measurement bases explicit.
Verified cost dataset
Raw commission pricing versus a spread-based public offer
IC Markets Raw Spread uses a two-part cost structure: a low raw spread plus a separate commission. This makes trade frequency and lot size especially important because commission scales directly with volume.
XM’s public pricing claim is simpler—spread-based and zero commission—but the public source used here does not expose a matching average spread for each major pair. The comparison remains useful for understanding structure, but not for ranking average execution costs.
Cost comparison FAQ
Why did ForexReview use 0.1 pip for IC EUR/USD?
IC’s Raw Spread account page explicitly states an average EUR/USD spread of 0.1 pip. ForexReview uses that narrative figure rather than relying on a table scrape that can mis-format decimals.
What commission does IC Raw Spread charge?
The USD-based MetaTrader Raw Spread structure is $3.50 per lot per side, or $7 round turn for one standard lot.
Can XM’s 0.8-pip floor be compared directly with IC’s 0.1-pip average?
No. A minimum and an average answer different questions. The calculator shows both but keeps their status labels separate.